“are you a racist?”
"danm what f**king are you talking about"
啊，今天，我们来说一下关于种族歧视(racist)的问题，因为最近和一个美国网友交流过，但苦于一直没有时间复盘，所以今天我们可以来分析一下这个问题，首先我们可以来看一下之前的聊天记录，起初我持有的观点是“种族歧视”存在合理性，当然，这个观点后面被我修正了，也不能太极端了对吧：
Today,we'll start a topic about "Racist":
当然，你看上面的内容可能有些头大，因为我也用的翻译器……😋，大概内容就是我们双方持有了不同的观点，此处我们省略了聊天记录截图（节省视觉空间）为此，我在下方作一个提炼：
Of course, the content above might appear somewhat overwhelming — after all, I used a translator too… Nevertheless, the core idea is that both parties hold differing perspectives. To clarify, I will summarize the key points below:
>>>miran
- It makes the equlity(反对种族歧视彰显平等观念)
- It's a traditionally significant think in America(这种观念已经深入人心)
- With too many violent events happend-we need it(尝试用这种观念来修正社会矛盾)
- Historical and real data is not the unique aspect for poeple to judge a race(认为历史经验不能代表一切，不能根据刻板印象去贬低别人)
>>>我
- 种族歧视的本质是排外，而中国传统文化中的“非我族类，其心必诛”也具有一定的合理性，美国作为一个大型移民国家，如果接受了一切人（好坏不分），就容易因为文化不通而造成文化冲突或者社会的不稳定（狗头保命，比如川普的家族其实也是移民来的，他的政治水平和为人就不需要我说了吧，在美国这个民主制国家还想要当太阳）| The essence of racial discrimination lies in exclusivity
- 种族歧视有时候往往是建立在大量数据统计之上的，比如一句经典的话，“你能说出一位黑人科学家的名字吗？”，“那么白人或者黄种人科学家呢？” | At times, racial discrimination is not based on pure emotion, but on large-scale statistical observations. A well-known quote illustrates this: “Can you name a Black scientist?” — followed by “Now, how about a White or Asian scientist?”
- 有些人将反种族歧视当作自己逃避责任的借口，比如“你为什么责怪我？就因为我是女性？” | Furthermore, some individuals exploit anti-discrimination narratives to evade personal accountability, such as responding to criticism with, “Are you blaming me just because I’m a woman?”
好的，那么综上的信息让我们再来整合一下已有的信息，并进行进一步的分析……
Given the information above, let us attempt to integrate and further analyze these perspectives.
首先，我们需要去推测这种“反种族歧视”思想的来源，众所周知，美国是一个移民国家，聚集了大量世界各地的人才，当然，正如我们上文所提到的，多样化的人口类型必然增加其管理难度，现实层面的需求自然就催生出了“反种族歧视主义”这一思想。
First, we must examine the origin of anti-racist ideology. It is well known that the United States is an immigrant nation, home to a wide range of talents from around the globe. As mentioned earlier, population diversity inevitably increases governance complexity. Thus, the need to maintain social stability led to the emergence of anti-racism ideology.
客观来说，如果这一思想能够有效协调不同文化的差异，绝对算的上是人类文明的进步，因为他能够有效推动人类文化一体化的进程，但就从这个思想的现实影响来看，前期确实起到了很好的作用，但是越到后期，这个思想本身受到了越来越大的扭曲，比如，人们会认为一个人不应该拥有任何原先在他们身上的不良标签，比如一个黑人他本身就喜欢聚众闹事，但面临法庭的指控，他就有可能拿出“反种族歧视”的话来反对指控甚至是倒打一耙。
Objectively speaking, if this ideology can effectively mediate cultural differences, it would constitute a true advancement in human civilization, as it contributes to the unification of human culture. In its initial stages, this ideology did indeed yield positive results. However, in recent years, it has become increasingly distorted in practice.For example, some believe that individuals should never be labeled negatively — regardless of their actions. If a person of color frequently engages in disruptive behavior, they might still invoke anti-discrimination rhetoric in court to deflect accusations or even counterattack.
而且，从政治角度看，美国政府利用政权欺压和压榨弱小国家的情况已经屡见不鲜，难道反种族歧视的根本不是保护弱小？这一点我们暂且不提。
Moreover, from a political point of view, it is not uncommon for the US government to use its regime to oppress and oppress weak and small countries. We won't mention that for now
这种情况，其实也可以看作过度宣扬政治思想和理论本身不完善的结果，美国作为一个以自由思想为核心的国家，却推行这种绝对执行的思想来限制每个人的言论，因为也许我们是无法改变对人的成见的，比如你一遍痛恨着日本人对中国人做出的伤害，一遍又不得不承认日本的文艺事业在世界上的知名度极高，你也喜欢他们的动漫文化。
This phenomenon can be interpreted as the result of over-politicization and the inherent inconsistency within ideological structures. While the U.S. emphasizes freedom of thought, its practice of rigid ideological enforcement — particularly in areas related to race — restricts genuine freedom of expression.After all, prejudice is difficult to eliminate completely. For instance, one may deeply resent the atrocities committed by Japanese forces against the Chinese people, yet still admire Japan’s cultural exports, such as anime and literature.
这本身又什么问题吗？并没有什么问题。偏见是可以通过自己的努力被消弭的，中国人在清代被视作落后和野蛮的象征，那时的诸国对我们只有鄙视，现在呢？也许更多的是好奇，羡慕。甚至是……恐惧
Is this contradictory? Not necessarily. Prejudice can be gradually overcome. Consider how, during the Qing dynasty, Chinese people were often regarded by the West as backward and uncivilized. Today, the global view may include curiosity, admiration — or even fear.
所以这个"反种族歧视"的思想可能需要经过系统性的重构，才能最终更好地服务于美国人民甚至是世界--我的意思是，偏见的存在本身就是让你认清自己，当然如果你愿意一直听谎言当我没说。
Therefore, the ideology of anti-racism may require a systematic reconstruction in order to truly serve not only the American public but also the global community.What does this entail? Prejudice, when viewed objectively, can help individuals better understand themselves. Of course, if one prefers to live in comforting falsehoods, then that is a personal choice.
那么如何去重构他？我觉得首先我们需要了解种族歧视的定义，从他的定义来看，表面上他的逻辑严密，但正如我上文所提到的，它也有可能成为社会冲突的导火索，深信这个理念的人用它规避责任，不信它的人用极端行为来回应它。
To reconstruct this ideology, we must first clarify the definition of racial discrimination. It is defined as any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, color, descent, or national/ethnic origin.On the surface, this definition appears logically rigorous. However, as previously discussed, in practice it can serve as both a tool for avoiding responsibility and a trigger for social conflict. Those who believe in it may use it to shield themselves; those who oppose it may react with hostility.
它的根本是基于种族、肤色、世系或民族、人种的任何区别、排斥、限制或优惠，如果我们想要去优化它，就必须将其从传统的种族架构中剥离出去--即在这个框架内抛弃所有对种族的定义（假设此理论名为“元文化理论”），单纯反对刻板印象，比如“我认为胖子都是不健康的”违反了元文化定义的内容，“我认为美国人都是肥胖的”违反了反种族歧视的内容，从包含广度和适用性来说，“反种族歧视”理论则显得漏洞更多，适用的范围更小。
Its fundamental problem lies in its fixation on race, ethnicity, or ancestry. To refine this framework, we must detach it from traditional racial constructs. That is, within this framework, all racial definitions must be discarded.Let us assume the existence of a new theoretical model — “Meta-Cultural Theory.” This theory would focus solely on challenging stereotypes, rather than referencing race or ethnicity.For example:“I think fat people are all unhealthy” would violate Meta-Cultural principles (as it stereotypes).“I think all Americans are obese” would violate traditional anti-racism principles.From the perspectives of scope and applicability, Meta-Cultural Theory would likely be more coherent and broadly useful than conventional anti-racism frameworks, which are often logically inconsistent and narrowly applicable.
当然之前我对于种族歧视持有一定肯定态度的事已被我自己驳回，因为仔细思考下当下的弱势群体确实需要保护，至少从形式上需要这个东西，来维持社会的稳定，不过，如果美国社会一直持有这种已经被扭曲的思想而不尝试去改变，那么，意义何在？
Finally, my previously ambivalent stance toward certain aspects of racial exclusivity has been self-refuted. Upon further reflection, it is clear that disadvantaged groups do require protection, at least symbolically or institutionally, in order to maintain social order and cohesion.But what's the point of American society if it's been holding on to this distorted mindset and not trying to change it?
Comments NOTHING